SynAct: Synergistic Active Feedback Learning for LLM Agents
LLM agents executing multi-step workflows fail in two fundamentally different ways: recoverable slips, which further attempts can repair, and knowledge gaps, which retrying cannot resolve. Expert feedback can address the latter, but expert attention is scarce.
This paper introduces SynAct, an active learning framework designed to improve the performance of large language model (LLM) agents by strategically incorporating expert feedback during multi-step workflows.
What happened
The article presents SynAct, a framework that addresses LLM agent failures by identifying high-impact decisions through mutual information analysis. It demonstrates how expert feedback can be optimally allocated to improve agent performance, with theoretical guarantees and empirical validation across multiple benchmarks.
Why it matters
Improving LLM agent reliability is critical for real-world applications. SynAct's approach reduces dependency on continuous expert input while maintaining performance, offering a scalable solution for complex decision-making tasks.
- Expert feedback should target high-impact decisions rather than entire tasks
- Mutual information analysis effectively identifies critical decision points
- Distilled rules enable long-term performance improvements without ongoing expert input
- The framework outperforms existing routing strategies in controlled experiments
- Theoretical insights explain limitations of success-based feedback approaches
The bigger picture
SynAct demonstrates significant accuracy improvements in agent benchmarks and provides a framework for efficient expert feedback allocation, which could enhance the practical deployment of LLM agents in critical workflows.
SynAct offers a novel approach to enhancing LLM agent performance by strategically integrating expert feedback, validated through theoretical analysis and empirical results across multiple benchmarks.
Technical details
- Mutual information between actions and terminal outcomes for decision prioritization
- Transferable rule distillation from expert corrections
- Theoretical analysis of outcome-constant vs. outcome-separating decisions
- Inference-time routing optimization using the same feedback signal
FAQ
What are the two types of failures LLM agents experience?
Recoverable slips (errors that can be fixed with retries) and knowledge gaps (errors that require expert intervention).
How does SynAct prioritize expert feedback?
By ranking decisions based on mutual information between actions and terminal outcomes across multiple rollouts.
What performance improvements did SynAct achieve?
An average +11.7% accuracy improvement across 16 evaluated settings, outperforming existing routing strategies in 15 of 16 cases.
This summary and analysis were generated with AI from the original article and may contain errors. Read the original for the full story.
Read the full story
Originally published by arXiv cs.LG on Oct 12, 2026.
Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.